© 2014 Calvin L. Carter. All rights
reserved.
Anyone who’s followed my blog for any
length of time knows that
my study of the late Federico Tesio, a world-renowned owner, breeder and
trainer of Thoroughbred racehorses, and Franco Varola, a contemporary of Tesio
and an equally-renowned writer, author and developer of the Dosage theory, has
had a tremendous impact on how I determine if a young horse has star potential.
I’ve written numerous blogs about Signors Varola and Tesio. Both were geniuses in
the respective fields.
During his lifetime, Tesio bred an incredible 22 Italiano Derby
winners. Varola’s Dosage
system, not the one commonly used today, consisted of five “aptitudinal”
groups, and Varola was most interested in the behavioral traits and
characteristics that each sire transmitted to his offspring.
Varola,
also, wrote several articles, during his lifetime, about Tesio and his book, The Tesio Myth, published in 1984 by J.
A. Allen & Company Limited, is an excellent read for the student of
pedigrees and breeding methods.
Recently,
I had the pleasure to read a Varola article about Tesio which was published in
the November, 1958, edition of The
British Racehorse. The title: Some
Famous Tesio Horses, Notes on his opinions and system of breeding is an
excellent article and I thought I’d pass along some excerpts about two of Tesio’s
best horses – Cavalier
D’Arpino and Ribot. The
Cavalier was the great grandsire of Ribot:
During sixty-two
years as master of Dormello and breeder/owner/trainer, the late Federico Tesio
probably handled more good horses than any other professional in the history of
the turf. A Dormello crop seldom, if ever, exceeded twenty foals, and of these
only a minority remained for a long time in Tesio’s hands, either as racehorses
or as stallions and broodmares. The number of those who have left a mark on
Italian and world breeding at large, is, nonetheless so high as to justify an
examination of the best among them, and even of some who have remained less
known in Italy and abroad. …
In Tesio’s own opinion,
the best horse he ever bred was Cavalier D’Arpino. …
The Cavalier’s dam,
Chuette, was quite a good mare whom Tesio had bought in England, and she was by
Cicero out of Chute by Carbine. Her success at stud in Italy had been out of
all proportion to her purchase price. …
The Cavalier was not
a good-looking horse, and he had not got the best of limbs. As a matter of
fact, he was a bit course, somewhat barrel-chested, and, all considered, far
from representing a model equine build. As a two year old, he could not be
trained successfully, and as a three year old he was only seen once in public,
when cantering away with a minor race over the straight course at San Siro. …
It was the frequent
practice of Federico Tesio not to hurry with backward colts, and concentrate
exclusively on those who could be depended upon for the classic races; a wise
practice when the five classics, in Italy as well as in other countries, were
still the most valuable races that could be won, having not yet lost much of
their prestige to the weight for age races. …
It was only as a four
year old that the Cavalier gave a full measure of his racing potential. …
There was in the
Cavalier a supreme detachment from the horses and things around him, which made
him a unique horse and justified Tesio’s opinion of him. His physical
possibilities were tremendous, and there was never another horse who could get
near him, for his stride was overwhelming, and his behavior was more of a
machine than an animal. In a sense, he was not even brilliant, for his style of
running suggested nothing but coldness and composure. Under the circumstances,
all his jockey had to do was just sit in the saddle, for there could be no
question of having to warm him up, or to submit him to any particular tactics. …
After this redoubtable
trial, the Cavalier was trained on with a view to follow the path of [the
Italian-bred] Ortello and capture the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, and it is
quite possible that, had he stood further training, he might have anticipated
the feat of Ribot by twenty-five years [Ribot won the 1955 and 1956 Arc]; but,
as things went, he turned up lame and had to be retired even before going to
Paris. He can be considered much in the same class as his great-grandson Ribot,
for both had outstanding physical means and an ideal racing temperament. Ribot,
however, is free from the unsoundness which afflicted the Cavalier, and which
was transmitted to a number of his descendents.
Cavalier
D’Arpino was undefeated in six starts and his great-grandson, Ribot, was undefeated
in 16 starts. Unfortunately, Tesio died in 1954 and he never got to see Ribot race.
Indeed,
the above magazine excerpts are a small illustration of the depth of knowledge
of Franco Varola and Federico Tesio. Both had a keen understanding of Thoroughbreds,
their pedigrees, conformation and behavior, which is sorely lacking in most
modern-day breeding. Two quotes that aptly illustrate their knowledge of the
Thoroughbred come from Varola and Maria Incisa della Rochetta who was Tesio’s
business partner for 20 years.
In
Typology of the Racehorse (J. A.
Allen & Company Limited, 1974), Varola noted:
The differences
between the five aptitudinal groups are of essence or character. It matters
very little whether a racehorse is 16 hands or 16.2, or whether it is chestnut
or brown; but it does matter a lot the way he behaves in actual racing, whether
he is consistent or erratic, brilliant or slow, bellicose or resigned, in other
words which pattern or mode of being is he expressing...It is of great utility
to be able to distinguish between these various aptitudes, this being something
that plays an effective part in mating.
In
his book, The Tesios, As I Knew Them,
published by J. A. Allen & Company Limited, 1979, Rochetta wrote:
We used to play a
game at Dormello. Tesio, Donna Lydia [Tesio’s wife], my wife and I would each
select our choice from the current crop of yearlings. The names would be put in
a sealed envelope to be opened a couple of years later. When this happened,
Tesio’s intuition was apparent, although it would have been impossible to
define the basis on which he had made his choice, for it was certainly not
based on conformation. Eventually I became convinced that Tesio had the knack
to see into the horse’s “morale.”
Thank
you, Signors Varola, Tesio.
Good Job! I enjoyed enough reading your latest article to read it again and again! It was so helpful. Waiting for your next entry.
ReplyDeleteThoroughbred Analytics
Dear Sir
ReplyDeleteVarola has nothing to invent, jute write.
Heads of breeds they were created 50 years before by
The Vuillier Colonel who worked for the Aga Khan 3 to buy
Lady Josephine
it gives birth to, among other. Mumtaz mahal, Nasrullah, Mahmoud,
Bahram, Alibhai, Gallant Man Khaled Sheshoon Charloterville
Tehran ETC ... and the wife of Colonel Vuillier has continued to work for the Aga Khan 3 and the selections in the Race
the denier scelectioner by Colonel was Phalaris !!! ...
Which horse was born Varola? NOTHING response
ad Caesari quod est Caesaris,
Dear Anonymous,
DeleteThank you for following and contributing to my blog.
True, Varola did not invent the designation of Chefs-de-Race. However, he did much to continue the work begun by Lt. Colonel J.J. Vuillier and Varola introduced aptitudinal analysis to the work begun by Vuillier. The behavioral aspect is what I find most fascinating about Varola's work.
dabit Deo quae Dei (give to God the things of God)
Calvin
excuse Heads of breeds = CHEFS DE RACE Merci
ReplyDeleteGood morning, dear Sir
ReplyDeleteI'm AnonymousAugust 3, 2016 at 8:30 AM
Tesio does not work with Breed Leaders but only with NICKS in which he incorporate undefeated horses.
I made a site that explains it if you want the address I would give it to you
good continuation
Franck Bridget
I have known Tesio’s secret / formula for months & I have always maintained that the Aga Khan family knew Tesio’s theory.
ReplyDelete